IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 (2) CRR-324-2006 Date of decision: 08.07.2026 BUDH RAM ......Petitioners VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUKHVINDER KAUR ***** Present: - Mr. Deepak Goyat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Dhruv Dayal, Addl. A.G. Haryana. for the respondent-State. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present revision petition has been preferred by the complainant-Budh Ram against the judgment dated 01.06.2005 passed in Sessions Case No. 27 of 10.11.2001 arising out of FIR No. 107 dated 27.06.2001 registered under Sections 302, 307, 148, 149, 447, 506 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 25, 27 and 29 of the Arms Act, 1959 at Police Station Chandimandir to the extent whereby the trial Court had acquitted the respondent(s)-accused Sewa Singh son of Harnam Singh, resident of village Bhareli, Tehsil & District Panchkula; Nirmal Singh son of Baldev Singh, resident of village Bhareli, Tehsil & District Panchkula, Jaspal VISHAL SHARMA 2026.07.09 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRR-324-2006 -2- Singh son of Saudagar, resident of village Bhareli, Tehsil & District Panchkula and Rajiv Kumar son of Dharam Pal, resident of village Barwala, Tehsil & District Panchkula. 2. Learned State Counsel has submitted a report dated 08.07.2026 as per which the aforesaid respondent(s)-accused persons have died on 18.02.2019, 06.02.2024, 10.04.2021 and 20.03.2007 respectively. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE (SUKHVINDER KAUR) 08.07.2026 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2026.07.09 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document