SUI DHAR MALLICK v. HARYANA VIDYUT PRASARAN NIGAM & ANR.
CWP/11080/2006 · 2026-07-09
Aman Chaudhary
body2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 4625 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 4625 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 484 CWP-11080-2006 (O&M) Date of decision: 09.07.2026 Sui Dhar Mallick ....Petitioner Versus Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam and Another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Ms. Komal Sharma, DAG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1. Prayer made in the present petition for granting pay scale to the petitioner, from the date, he was promoted as technician Grade-I, might not be surviving, due to efflux of time.
2.
Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the cause of action still subsists.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE 09.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.09 17:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document