SHARNJIT SINGH DHALIWAL v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
CRM-M/29032/2026 · 2026-05-21
Vinod S Bhardwaj
Special Leave Petitionbody2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 4615 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 4615 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 126
Sharnjit Singh Dhaliwal State of Punjab and others CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE
Present :- Mr. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No. Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported i titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parkash Kaur and others” and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma & Ors.”. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to avail alternative remedies as are available to the petitioner in accordance with law. 3. In withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 21.05.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-29032 Date of decision:
Sharnjit Singh Dhaliwal
VERSUS and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ r. Nipun Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner
*****
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.PB-04AF-0936 Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parkash Kaur and others” and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition avail alternative remedies as are available to the petitioner in accordance with law. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 29032-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 21.05.2026
...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate for the petitioner.
The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the 0936 in view of the judgment of n RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parkash Kaur and others” and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition avail alternative remedies as are available to the petitioner in view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
JUDGE
SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.22 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document