Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2006 DAILYLAW 4612 (PNJ)

SUNITA DEVI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

CRM-M/28276/2026 · 2026-05-18

Vinod S Bhardwaj

Special Leave Petitionbody2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA 134 Sunita Devi State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present :- Mr. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.HR Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported i titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parkas Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma & Ors.”. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner with liberty to file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars. 3. In view of the above, the withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. 4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. 18.05.2026 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-28276 Date of decision: VERSUS Haryana and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ r. Jarnail Singh Saneta, Advocate for the petitioner ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the petitioner bearing registration No.HR-45-D-1702 in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. Vs. Parkash Kaur and others” and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel ing on behalf of the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the present petition file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as with liberty as aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 28276-2026(O&M) Date of decision: 18.05.2026 ...Petitioner(s) ...Respondent(s) VINOD S. BHARDWAJ Advocate for the petitioner. The present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondent No.4 to not to interfere in the free plying of the vehicle of the 1702 in view of the judgment of n RCR Criminal 2007(2) page 76 Kaur and others” and judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India reported in SLP (Crl.) No.4935 of 2006 decided on 15.05.2008 in case titled as “ICICI Bank Vs. Shanti Devi Sharma After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel seeks withdrawal of the present petition file a fresh petition with better and complete particulars. present petition is dismissed as Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2026.05.18 17:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document