119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3788-2006(O&M) Date of decision: 12.02.2026 PARTAP SINGH CHAWLA ..Appellant Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appelllant. Mr. Harish Nain, AAG, Haryana. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. On 17.11.2025, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as his counsel. 2. As per the report of registry, sole appellant has died and notice issued to learned counsel for the appellant received back with the report that file was taken up by the parties. 3. Today, none appeared despite calling twice. 4. In view of the same, this Court is left with no other choice but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 5. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 6. Liberty is however granted to legal representatives of the appellant to file an application for revival of the appeal, if any cause of action survives. 7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. 12.02.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) mahima JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MAHIMA 2026.02.18 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh