Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2006 DAILYLAW 3636 (MAD)

C.RAJAMANICKAM, (DIED) v. VELLURE BHAVA

SA(MD)/211/2006 · 2026-07-23

Mohammed Shaffiq

Transfer Petitionbody2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.09.2024 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 1.C.Rajamanickam (Died) 2.R.Valli (Died) 3.C.Vijayarani 4.T.Rathinamala 5.C.R.Jegadeeswaran 6.P.Latha 7.H.Sasirekha 8.R.Vasuki 9.R.Saravana Kannan 10.C.Pousala ... Appellants (Appellants 3 to 10 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased first appellant as per the order dated 21.07.2015 made in M.P.Nos.1 to 3/2014 in S.A.No.211/2006) (Memo dated 12.09.2019 in USR No.38168 is recorded as second appellant died and appellants 3 to 10, who are already on record, are recorded as LRs of the deceased second appellant) Vs. 1.Vellure Bhava 2.Mariam Bibi (Died) 3.C.Ramasamy 4.Velurammal 5.Pathumuthu Bivi 6.Mustafa 7.Abubacker (The respondents 3 to 7 are given up 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 in this second appeal) 8.Rafiya Begum 9.Rugumath 10.Jennath 11.Ameena (RR8 to 11 are brough on record as LRs of the deceased second respondent vide Court Order dated 22.02.2020) ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 18.04.2005 rendered in A.S.No.36 of 2002, on the file of the III Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai confirming the decree and judgment dated 15.10.2001 rendered in O.S.No.87 of 1997, on the file of the District Munsif, Madurai Taluk at Madurai. For Appellants : No appearance For R3 to R7 : Given up For R8 to R11 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan JUDGMENT When the matter was taken up for hearing on 03.09.2024, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant reported 'no instructions'. Hence, this Court had directed the Registry to print the name of the appellants in the cause list and directed to list the matter on 13.09.2024. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, even though the name of the appellants have been printed in the cause list, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants and the same clearly indicates that the appellants have not shown any interest to prosecute the appeal any further. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. 13.09.2024 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No am To 1. The III Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai. 2.The District Munsif, Madurai Taluk at Madurai. 3.The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J. am Judgment made in S.A(MD)No.211 of 2006 13.09.2024 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis