W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 13.03.2026 CORAM : THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 In W.P.No.9060 of 2006:- 1. N.Nagaraju 2. C.Manjunathadu 3. M.Suguna 4. S.N.Kumar 5. K.S.Narayana Murthy 6. N.Umakanth 7. Leelavathi 8. S.Uma 9. A.Premavathi 10. K.Anitha 11. T.Manjula 12. N. Madesh 13. V.Sivakumar 14. T.Kenchumunegowdu 15. N.Sailaja 16. G.Narasappa 17. S.Jayram 18. K. Hariesh 19. K.Chandrasekar 20. Prabha.V 21. G.N. Jaganatha Reddy 22. K. Soma Shekar 23. M. Chandra Mohan 24. S. Kesavamoorthy 25. K.J. Aruna 26. B. Chandrakala 27. M. Jayashankar 1/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 28. M. Sasikala 29. M. Munikrishnappa 30. C. Saila 31. C. Manjunatha 32. N. Sumangala 33. U.N. Madesh 34. V. Amurutha 35. A. Nagesh 36. N. Krishnappa 37. S.M. Ranga 38. M. Sreenivasan 39. C. Narayanappa 40. V. Krishna Setty 41. R. Munirajappa 42. R. Manjunath 43. B.A. Mahadeva 44. M. Chandra Kala 45. K.S. Bhasker 46. Dhamodar Naidu 47. N. Janardhan 48. N. Suresh 49. T. Manohar 50. K. Lakshmi 51. B. Mallesappa 52. G. Viswanatham 53. G.S. Vijaya Kumar .. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by its Secretary, Education Department, Ford St. George, Chennai. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai. 2/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 3. The Director of Employment and Training, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 4. The District Employment Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 5. The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri District, Govt. High School Road, Dharmapuri. .. Respondents In W.P.No.9063 of 2006:- N.Prakash .. Petitioner Versus The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. .. Respondent In W.P.No.9062 of 2006:- R.Pavadiappa .. Petitioner Versus 1. The Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 9. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, D.P.I. Compound, Chennai – 6. 3. The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 3/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 4. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. .. Respondents Prayer in W.P.No.9060 of 2006: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.No.(3d) 42, dated 02.08.2000 and the consequential proceedings made in Na.Ka.No.32852/ED3/97, dated 02.08.2000 passed by the 2nd respondent and set aside the same and to consequently direct the respondents to fill up the vacancies by appointing the applicants as Telugu Secondary Grade Teachers in Dharmapuri District as per rules. Prayer in W.P.No.9063 of 2006: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to consider the applicant for appointment as Secondary Grade Teacher (Telugu) if there are vacancies after appointing the Secondary Grade (Telugu) trained candidates. Prayer in W.P.No.9062 of 2006: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to select and appoint the applicant for the post of Secondary Grade Teachers (Telugu) pursuant to interview conducted on 04.10.2000 in Na.Ka.No.12337/AA3 2000 conducted by the third respondent. 4/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 For Petitioners : No Appearance (in all W.Ps) For Respondents : Mrs.P.Raja Rajeswari, (in all W.Ps) Government Advocate COMMON ORDER On 12.03.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, these matters are directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also, when the matters are taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the petitioners are not interested in pursuing the Writ Petitions and accordingly, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. 13.03.2026 Index : yes/no Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : yes/no grs 5/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 To 1. The Secretary, Education Department, Ford St. George, Chennai. 2. The Director of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai. 3. The Director of Employment and Training, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 4. The District Employment Officer, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. 5. The Chief Educational Officer, Dharmapuri District, Govt. High School Road, Dharmapuri. 6. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri District. 6/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 T.VINOD KUMAR, J. grs W.P.Nos.9060, 9063 and 9062 of 2006 13.03.2026 7/7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis