Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: SWP No. 884/2006
Ram Lal
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- None.
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate vice Mr. Ravinder Gupta, AAG for R- 1 and 2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 11.08.2026
Record reveals that, vide order dated 06.07.2026, petitioner was granted last opportunity to take steps for service of respondent No. 2 As per the report of the Registry, petitioner has failed to take steps for service of respondent No. 2. Even today, none appears on behalf of the petitioner. The conduct of the petitioner, therefore, clearly indicates that he is no longer interested in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 11.08.2026 Mihul
Sr. No. 35