Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRR No. 67/2006
State of J&K …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
Safdar Ali and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Achal Sharma, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 28.07.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 09.03.2026 and same was the position on 28.04.2026.
2. Today also, when the matter was taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 28.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 44