ANIL KUMAR BANSAL v. M/S VAISHYA CO-OPERATIVE ADARS
W.P.(C)/9752/2006 · 2026-05-11
Shail Jain
Writ Petition (Civil)body2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2475 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2475 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~4(R) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 9752/2006 ANIL KUMAR BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: None. versus M/S VAISHYA CO-OPERATIVE ADARS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kanupriya Chawla & Mr. Prashant Kumar, Advs. CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN O R D E R %
11.05.2026
1. The matter has been called twice, however, none has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner despite the second call. The Court notice issued to the Petitioner has been duly served, yet there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. It appears that the Petitioner is no longer interested in pursuing the present matter. Accordingly, the present matter is dismissed for want of prosecution.
SHAIL JAIN, J MAY 11, 2026 Pallavi/hp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2026 at 11:46:56