NIRANJAN CHUNILAL SHAH v. AMARJIT SINGH BHATIA AND ANR.
FA/855/2006 · 2026-09-16
body2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2186 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
5-FA-855-2006.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.855 OF 2006 Shri Niranjan Chunilal Shah ...Appellant V/s. Amarjit Singh Bhatia and Anr.
...Respondents ***** No one is present:- On behalf of the Appellant. No one is present:- On behalf of the Respondents. *****
CORAM :
S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE :
16th SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C. :-
1. On 10th August 2026, no one had appeared and hence, the matter was adjourned for dismissal on 24th August 2026. On that date, it was dismissed. However, on the basis of submissions made later on on the same date, it was not dismissed but adjourned for taking instructions as learned Advocate Mr.R.R.Salvi was suffering from some ailment.
2. Today, no one is present. This is an Appeal by the Claimant for enhancement. Dismissed for Default.
3. If steps are taken for restoration, it will be decided on merits. Satish Sangar 1/2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.09.17 15:08:18 +0530
5-FA-855-2006.doc
4. Refund of Court fees as per the Rules.
[S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 2/2