Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2006 DAILYLAW 2166 (BOM)

M/S. UNIVERSAL SALES CORPORATION THROUGH PROP.ARUN VASUDEV KULKARNI v. M/S. UNIVERSAL PAINT INDUSTRIES ON BEHALF OF PARTNER ASHOK VASANT NIRGUDKAR

SA/85/2006 · 2026-09-08

body2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Megha 902_sa_85_2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO.85 OF 2006 M/s. Universal Sales Corporation and its proprietor Arun Vasudev Kulkarni ...Appellant V/s. M/s. Universal Paint Industries, a registered Firm, through its Partner Ashok Vasant Nirgudkar ...Respondent ________________ Mr. Aniruddha A. Garge with Mr. Yash Gangal for the Appellant. Ms. Sweta Shah i/b. Mr. A.P. Kulkarni for the Respondent. Mr. Ashok Vasant Nirgudkar, Respondent through VC appeared. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 8 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1) The learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit that parties have amicably resolved the disputes amongst them. The consent terms are tendered. Signatories to the consent terms are present through video conferencing. They admit their signatures on the consent terms as well as the contents thereof. The consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. Page No. 1 of 2 8 September 2026 2026:BHC-AS:36819 Megha 902_sa_85_2006 2) Second Appeal stands disposed of as per the terms agreed between the parties in the consent terms. The decree stands modified and substituted by the arrangement agreed between the parties in the consent terms. There shall be no order as to costs. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 8 September 2026 Signed by: Megha S. Parab Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 08/09/2026 15:18:29