MR JAGDISH CHIMANLAL MODY v. DR BEHRAM TAIMUR BADNIWALA AND OTHERS
FA/1474/2006 · 2026-08-31
body2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2157 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 2157 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
3 Fa-1474-2006.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1474 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 22705 OF 2018 Mr Jagdish Chimanlal Mody ...Appellant Vs. Dr Behram Taimur Badniwala and Others ...Respondents ***** None for the Appellant Mr. Ramesh Cheulkar for the Respondent No. 2 Ms. Harshada Rane (Through VC) For Respondent No. 3 *****
CORAM :
S. M. MODAK, J.
DATE :
31st AUGUST 2026 P. C. :-
1. Appellant died on 07.01.2016. Learned Registrar, Judicial – II as per conditional order dismissed the application for non-removal of the office objections vide order dated 18.08.2016. Civil Application (ST) No. 22705 of 2018 is filed for recalling the order. Since long no Seema 1/2 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Digitally signed by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date: 2026.09.01 11:26:55 +0530
3 Fa-1474-2006.doc one is prosecuting the application. Even on the last date i.e. 10th August 2026, no one was present. Today also no one is present.
2. Accordingly, Civil Application (ST) No. 22705 of 2018 is
disposed of.
3. First appeal was filed against dismissal of the Claim Petition.
4. In view of the above, the First Appeal stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
5. Record and proceedings be returned to the Tribunal on priority basis.
[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2