Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2006 DAILYLAW 1677 (AP)

Governament of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal v. Pyla Govinda Rao

WP/25991/2006 · 2026-07-07

Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026 Date of uploading : 09.07.2026 APHC010335062006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3601] WEDNESDAY, THE 8th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI WRIT PETITION NO: 25991/2006 Between: 1. GOVERNAMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY, IRRIGATION & CAD (P.W) DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETAIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NORTH COAST, I & CAD DEPARTMENT,, PEDA WALTAIR, OPP. A.U. REGISTRAR OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND CHAIRMAN OF THE SELECTION, COMMITTEE FOR DISPLACED PERSONS, SRIKAKULAM. 4. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,, VAMSAHARA PROJECT CIRCLE, ILLISIPURAM, SRIKAKUALM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PYLA GOVINDA RAO, S/O. APPAYYA UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. BHAGIRADHAPURAM, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. P RAMA SIVAJI, S/O. RAGHAVA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) 3. PANDRETI APPANNA, S./O. SRIRAMULU UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. A NARAYANA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. BRAMMA COLONY, TEKKALI POST, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. DANDASI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. ADINARAYANA UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. PEDDASRU VEEDHI, TEKKALI POST, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. K TIRUPATHI RAO, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. DEVARASETTI VEEDHI, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. K NARAYANA RAO, S/O. KOTESWARA RAO UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. PEDAKOLLIVALASA VILLAGE, L.N. PETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. PANDIRI PARVATEESAM, S/O. CHINNAVADU UN-EMPLOYEE R/O. KORADA VILLAGE, HIRAMANDALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ order or a direction more particularly one in the nature of the writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal in OA No. 1071 of 2006 dt. 2-5-2006 dt. 2-5-2006 and quash the same as perverse an in excess of the jurisdiction. IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 33371 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the judgement rendered by the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad passed in the OA No. 1071/2006 dt. 2-5-2006 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass such other order or orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP 22961 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased 3 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) To fix an early date for hearing of the above WP NO. 25991/2006 in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 1353 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the writ petition by fixing an early date of hearing and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P KRISHNA REDDY 2. AKKAM ESHWAR The Court made the following: 4 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) ORDER :-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned Government Pleader for Services-II appearing for the petitioners, submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 2. Recording the submission as aforesaid, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J _____________________________________ PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI, J Date : 08.07.2026. RPD. Whether the order is : Speaking ✔ Yes/ No Reasoned ✔ Yes/ No Reportable ✔ Yes/ No Non-Reportable ✔ Yes/ No 5 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PURUSHOTTAM KUMAR CHINTALAPUDI (DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS) WRIT PETITION NO: 25991 of 2006 Date: 08.07.2026 6 (RNT,J & PKC,J WP.NO.25991 OF 2006) RPD.