M/s. Sree Rayalaseema HI-Strength Hypo Ltd., v. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd.,
WP/479/2006 · 2026-05-05
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2006
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 1664 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2006 DAILYLAW 1664 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010440732006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 479/2006 Between:
1. M/S. SREE RAYALASEEMA HI-STRENGTH HYPO LTD., GUNDIPORLA, KURNOOL-4, KURNOOL DISTRICT, REP BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, R.MADAN MOHAN RAO.
...PETITIONER AND
1. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A P LTD, (A.P.TRANSCO) REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRTABAD, HYDERABAD.
2. THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A P LTD, (A.P.TRANSCO) REP BY ITS CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, SINGARENI BHAVAN, RED HILLS, HYDERABAD.
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER COMMERCIAL, TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF A.P., LTD. (A.P.TRANSCO)- VIDYUT SOUDHA, KHAIRTABAD, HYDERABAD.
4. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., (A.P.TRANSCO) SEETHARAM PRASAD MANSION, REDHILLS, HYDERABAD.
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY- OF A.P., LTD., (A.P.TRANSCO), KURNOOL.
6. A P GAS POWER CORPORATION, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, FLAT NO.202, 2ND FLOOR, PANCOM CAMBERS, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500 016.
2 MRK,J W.P.No.479 of 2006
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the letter No.CE(Comml)/ADE- 1/F.Ryalaseema HH Ltd/D.No.332/05 dt.12-05-2005 and letter No.CGM(Expr)/CPDCL/GM(R)/AAO-HT/D.No.544/05 dt.20-05-2005 of the 3rd respondent as communicated to the petitioners through the 5th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and void and consequently set aside the same pass such other order or orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 583 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 5 to collect the Wheeling Charges at 12.5% on the petitioner's share of energy, which is being supplied by the 6th respondent and wheeled through the Transmission lines of A.P. Transco pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D V NAGARJUNA BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
2. 0
3. P SRI RAGHU RAM The Court made the following:
3 MRK,J W.P.No.479 of 2006
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 479 of 2006
ORDER:-
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer:
“….to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the letter No.CE(Comml)/ADE-1/F.Ryalaseema HH Ltd/D.No.332/05 dt.12-05- 2005 and letter No.CGM(Expr)/CPDCL/GM(R)/AAO-HT/D.No.544/05 dt.20-05-2005 of the 3rd respondent as communicated to the petitioners through the 5th respondent as highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust and void and consequently set aside the same pass such other
order or orders..….”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Tirumalasetty Kiran and learned Standing Counsels for respondents.
3. Previously the matter is listed on 09.03.2026, 30.04.2026 and 04.05.2026 for getting latest instructions in the lis. At last, when the lis is taken up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel submits that apparently as of now there are no dues from the petitioner to the respondents. He further submits that the wheeling charges settled by the Court in identical matters, the required amount has been paid by the petitioner in favour of the respondents.
4 MRK,J W.P.No.479 of 2006
4. In the light of the above facts and circumstances, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the same may be recorded and the petition may be closed.
5. In view of the submissions by both the counsels, as cause in the lis already resolved, by recording the same, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 06.05.2026 PBS
5 MRK,J W.P.No.479 of 2006
216
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No. 479 of 2006
Date: 06.05.2026
PBS