Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2006 DAILYLAW 1650 (AP)

MARGANI RAMESH v. THE PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRALGOVT INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL & 4

WP/16461/2006 · 2026-04-08

Challa Gunaranjan

body2006

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010195652006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WRIT PETITION NO: 16461 of 2006 Bench Sr.No:-41 [3506] Margani Ramesh ...Petitioner Vs. The Presiding Officer Central Govt Industrial Tribunal and Others ...Respondent(s) ********** Advocate for Petitioner: O MANOHER REDDY Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA, V UMA DEVI CORAM :SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN DATE : 9th April 2026 ORDER: Present writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking following relief: “to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari and call for the records pertaining to the Award passed in LCID. No.88 of 2003, dated 17.05.2005, on the file of The Central Government Industrial Tribunal – cum - Labour Court, Hyderabad and set aside/quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, bad in law and excess utilization of its power and consequently direct the respondents to engage petitioner and regularize in service in the due course and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.” 2 CGR, J W.P. No.16461 of 2006 2. Heard Sri S.Noor Mohammed, learned counsel, representing Sri O.Manohar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel for petitioner on record and Smt.V.Uma Devi, learned standing counsel for respondents. 3. Both learned counsels have stated that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the orders dated 20.03.2019 passed in W.A. No.1268 of 2014 and batch, therefore, the writ petition may be disposed of in terms of the same. 4. Considering aforesaid submissions, this writ petition stands disposed of by setting aside the impugned award dated 17.05.2005 passed in LCID. No.88 of 2003, on the file of learned Central Government Industrial Tribunal – cum – Labour Court, Hyderabad, and the matter stands remanded to the Tribunal with a direction to dispose of the same after de novo consideration, within an outer limit of five months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending in this case, if any, shall stand closed. CHALLA GUNARANJAN, J ss