IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLREV No.496 of 2005 Mayadhar Naik …. Petitioner Mr. S. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Orissa 2. Budhia Dehury 3. Pankaja Naiak …. Opposite Parties Mr. C. R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 19.05.2026 04. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The judgment of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kamakhyanagar acquitting the Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3 of charge under Section 436/34 of IPC in CT(S) No.25/244 of 2003, is assailed in this revision. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel that the appreciation of evidence by the learned Court in seisin is perverse for which the interference of this Court is warranted in the interest of justice. 4. This Court perused the materials on record qua the judgment passed. 5. Considering the contours of exercising jurisdiction regarding an order of acquittal, this Court is not persuaded to hold that the matter merits interference and it has resulted in any miscarriage of justice. 6. The Criminal Revision is accordingly disposed of. (V. Narasingh) Judge Jina