Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2005 DAILYLAW 516 (HP)

HARI SINGH v. CHAINO

RSA/393/2005 · 2026-03-18

Rakesh Kainthla

body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Hari Singh vs. Chaino & Ors. RSA No. 393 of 2005 18.03.2026 Present: None for the appellant. None for respondents No.1, 2(a) to 2(g), 5(a) to 5(f), 5(h) and 5(i). Mr. R.K. Sharma, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shivani Thakur, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4. There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on the last date of hearing as well. Today the case has been called repeatedly but the appellant is not appearing nor any reasonable cause has been assigned for his non-appearance, which shows that appeallant is not interested in pursuing the matter; therefore, the present appeal is dismissed in default. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 18th March, 2026 (Nikita)