COLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, BANGALORE v. WIPRO LTD.
2005-02-16
Arijit Pasayat, C K Thakker, Ruma Pal
body2005
DailyLaw.ai
ORDER In view of the concurrent findings of fact regarding the classification of the goods in question, and having regard to the further fact that a very small quantum of revenue is involved, we do not deem it fit to interfere with the impugned order. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.