SA(MD) No.449 of 2005 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.07.2026 CORAM : THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL SA.(MD)No.449 of 2005 1.M.Sivaraman S/o.Muthusawami Servai East Nachikulam Vadipatti Taluk Madurai District. ... Appellant Vs 1.M.Sivashanmugam, (died) 2.Pushpasundari No.16/670 K.K.Nagar Madurai-620 020. 3.Balakrishnan No.16/670 K.K.Nagar Madurai-620 020. 4.Saravanan No.16/670 K.K.Nagar Madurai-620 020. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD) No.449 of 2005 5.Rathina No.16/670 K.K.Nagar Madurai-620 020. (Respondents 2 To 5 Are Brought On Record As Lrs Of The Deceased Sole Respondent Vide Court Order Dated 14.03.2009 Made In Mp(md)no. 1 Of 2007 In Sa 449/05) Prayer : Second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned Third Additional Subordinate Judge, Madurai dated 11/02/2004 in AS.No.67/2000 confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Learned District Munsif, Madurai Taluk dated 14/01/2000 in OS.No.123/1997. For Appellant : Mr.M.Hariharan For Respondents : Mr.K.Sekar JUDGMENT This second appeal has been filed challenging the Judgment and Decree of the Learned Third Additional Subordinate 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD) No.449 of 2005 Judge, Madurai dated 11/02/2004 in AS.No.67/2000 confirming the Judgment and Decree of the Learned District Munsif, Madurai Taluk dated 14/01/2000 in OS.No.123/1997. 2.Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel on either side submits that the appellant and the respondents are relatives and the matter has been settled. 3.In view of the above, this second appeal in SA.(MD)No.449 of 2005 stands dismissed as abated. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are closed. 09.07.2026 gns TO 1.The Third Additional Subordinate Court, Madurai 2.The District Munsif, Madurai Taluk 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis SA(MD) No.449 of 2005 R.SAKTHIVEL ,J. gns SA.(MD)No.449 of 2005 09.07.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis