Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1937 (MAD)

KOVAI KILAKKU MAVATTA v. DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL

WP/14148/2005 · 2026-07-08

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No.14148 of 2005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN WP No.14148 of 2005 1. Kovai Kilakku Mavatta Panchalai Thozhilalar Sangam (CITU) (Regn. No.1006/CBE), 280, Thyagi Palanisamy Nilayam, Avinashi Road, Tirupur 641 602. 2. K.Muthu .. Petitioners -vs- 1. Debt Recovery Tribunal, Rep. By its Recovery Officer, 1670, Trichy Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore 641 045. 2. Indian Bank, Rep. By its Chief Manager, Asset Recovery Management Branch, 31, V.H.Road, 2nd Floor, Coimbatore 641 001. 3. M/s.Shree Arunachaleswarar Mills, Rep. By its Partner, Arooncraft House, Venkatesa Mills Post, Udumalpet 642 128. .. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the Tender-Cum-Auction sale notice dt.31.03.2005 in R.P.No.175/2003 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.14148 of 2005 issued by the 1st respondent as published in the Dinamalar News paper, Coimbatore Edution, dt.1.4.2005 read with the subsequention auction notification dt.Nil published by the 2nd respondent in Dinamalar daily dt.03.01.2009 to sell the 3rd respondent mill properties without considering the plight of the workers and quash the same as being illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the scheme of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 and Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. (Prayer amended as per order dt.15.02.2012 by KVJ in WPMP No.364/2011 in WP No.14148/2005) For Petitioners : Mr.K.Srinivasamurthy * * * * * ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petition is rendered infructuous and therefore, may be dismissed as such. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the interim application stands closed. (SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ.) (G.ARUL MURUGAN, J.) 08.07.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No sra https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.14148 of 2005 To 1. The Recovery Officer , Debt Recovery Tribunal, 1670, Trichy Road, Ramanathapuram, Coimbatore 641 045. 2. The Chief Manager , Indian Bank, Asset Recovery Management Branch, 31, V.H.Road, 2nd Floor, Coimbatore 641 001. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No.14148 of 2005 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN, J. (sra) WP No.14148 of 2005 08.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis