Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1868 (BOM)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEERE (M S E B ) v. PRAKASH NAGIN PATIL and ORS.

CA/9877/2008 · 2026-09-04

body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903-FA-613-2005.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 903 FIRST APPEAL NO. 613 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9877 OF 2008 IN FA/613/2005 Executive Engineer (M.S.E.B.) VERSUS Prakash Nagin Patil and Others …… Mr. Sanjay Mundhe, Advocate for the Appellant Mr. J.R. Shah, Advocate for Respondents No.1 to 4 Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for Respondent No.5-State …... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 04 SEPTEMBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant assail the Judgment and award dated 08.03.2005 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Shahada in L.A.R. No. 2 of 1998 (Old LAR No.4 of 1996) 3. Learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned AGP submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government 2026:BHC-AUG:41309 903-FA-613-2005.odt 2 Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 6. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane