Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1824 (BOM)

SHRI SAI JANVIKAS PRATISHTHANS SHRI SAI COLLEGE OF PHARMACY THROUGH PRAMOD UTTAMRAO SHINDE v. PHARMACY COUNCIL OF INDIA THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR CUM SECRETARY

WP/2016/2019 · 2026-04-08

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Vaishali Patil Jadhav

body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{1} wp2005-19.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2005 OF 2019 Dharati Janseva Pratishthan’s DJPS College of Pharmacy through Pramod Uttamrao Shinde PETITIONER VERSUS Pharmacy Council of India through its Registrar Cum Secretary RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2006 OF 2019 Shri Sai Janvikas Pratisthan’s Ojas College of Pharmacy through Pramod Uttamrao Shinde PETITIONER VERSUS Pharmacy Council of India through its Registrar Cum Secretary RESPONDENT WITH WRIT PETITION NO.2016 OF 2019 Shri Sai Janvikas Pratisthan’s Shri Sai College of Pharmacy through Pramod Uttamrao Shinde PETITIONER VERSUS Pharmacy Council of India through its Registrar Cum Secretary RESPONDENT ....... Mr. D. S. Bagul, Advocate for the Petitioner Ms. Priyanka Deshpande for Mr. S. B. Deshpande, for Respondent ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. J.] DATE : 8 th APRIL, 2026 2026:BHC-AUG:15756-DB {2} wp2005-19.doc ORDER : 1. Learned Advocate for the Petitioners states that with the passage of time, the Writ Petitions are rendered infructuous. 2. Writ Petition are, therefore, disposed of as infructuous. [ VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/wp2005-19.doc