901.as.wp.7471.2005.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.7471 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Manisha Madhukar Sonar and ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7472 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Anita Bhikan Pankar and ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7473 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Smita Chhagan Zambare and ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7998 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Kailash Pandit Desale and ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8066 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Mohan Ganpat Patil and ors. ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8065 OF 2005 Saraswati Shikshan Sanstha and ors. ...Petitioners Versus Shantaram Yuvraj Patil and ors. ...Respondents Vina Khadpe 1 VINA ARVIND KHADPE Digitally signed by VINA ARVIND KHADPE Date: 2026.08.19 18:04:58 +0530 901.as.wp.7471.2005.doc **** Mr. Sharad Bhosale a/w Ms. Shraddha Pawar i/b. Mr. Dilip Bodake for the Petitioner in all the Petitions. Mr. N. R. Bubna a/w Mr. A. A. Achhra for Respondent No.1 in all Petitions. Mr. Sandip Babar, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/7471/2005. Mr. P. V. Nelson Rajan, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/7472/2005. Ms. Ashwini A Purav, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/7473/2005. Ms. Savina R Crasto, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/7998/2005. Ms. M. S. Srivastav, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/8066/2005. Mr. B B Dahiphale, AGP for Respondent / State in WP/8065/2005. **** CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J. DATE : 19th AUGUST, 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record a copy of written communication / intimation addressed to common Petitioner – an educational institute, asking to contact the Advocate. He has also placed on record the postal receipt and tracking report showing that the said intimation has been received by the Petitioner Institute on 18.07.2026. Copies of the said communication, postal receipt and tracking report are taken on record and marked ‘X’ collectively for identification. 2. Despite receipt of the intimation, nobody has contacted the Advocate and, therefore, he is unable to effectively assist the Court any further. 3. This situation amounts to non-prosecution. 4. In that view of the matter, Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim relief / ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated. 5. All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed copy of this order. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Vina Khadpe 2