1 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 8 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2005 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS SHIVAJI SANTRAM SHINGADE ... Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. ... WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2012 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS SUDHIR SUBAHSH BEMBADE … Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Respondent. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2013 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS ARVIND VASANT DAKE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2014 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS MAHALING SUBHASH MITKARI … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2015 OF 2014 Tauseef 2026:BHC-AUG:31785 2 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS BHANUDAS SANTRAM SHINGADE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellant No.3. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2016 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS BABRUWAN NIRUTTI BEMBADE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2007 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS DNYANOBA SANTRAM SHINGADE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2017 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS BAPURAO HANMANT KASALE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2019 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS Tauseef 3 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 BAPURAO GYANOBA KONDAMGIRE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2021 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS GYANDEO BAPURAO KONDAMIGIRE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2006 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS DATTATRAYA BABARAO SHINGADE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2020 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS SOPAN GYANOBA KONDAMIGRE AND ANR … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2018 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS JANARDHAN BABARAO SHINGADE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Tauseef 4 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2010 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS SIDRAM NARAYAN TELANG … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. Mr. Suraj V. Gundre, Advocate for Respondents. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2011 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR VERSUS MAHALING GANGADHAR YEDNE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2009 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR AND ANR VERSUS BALAJI DIGAMBAR YELALE … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 2008 OF 2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS VERSUS DHONDIRAJ SHIVDASAPPA MITKARI … Ms. Madhubala Bharat Gangwal, Advocate for Appellants. Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for the Appellant-State. Tauseef 5 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 22nd JULY, 2026 P.C.:- 1. Admit. 2. The acquisition proceeding is of the year 1996, heard finally with the consent of the parties at the admission stage. 3. By this appeal, the Appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 23.02.2007 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Ahmedpur, District Latur in LAR Nos.49/2002, 48/2002, 66/2002, 50/2002, 47/2002, 53/2002, 52/2002, 51/2002, 55/2002, 54/2002, 61/2002, 60/2002, 56/2002, 65/2002, 64/2002, 63/2002 and 62/2002. 4. Both the learned Advocates for the respective parties submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 5. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. Tauseef 6 of 6 08-FA.2005.2014 6. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned awards. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef