IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR No.695 of 2005 Reserved on: 10.08.2026 Pronounced on: 18.08.2026 Uploaded on: 19.08.2026 Whether only operative part of the judgment is Pronounced or the full judgment is pronounced: operative part/full judgment Sakesh Mani Sharma …Petitioner Versus Bhanu Parkash and another …Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Argued by:- Mr. Rahul Vats, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Bipan Ghai, Senior Advocate with Mr. Nikhil Ghai, Advocate Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate and Mr. Aditya Rampal, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana for respondent No.2-State. ***** MANDEEP PANNU, J. 1. Dismissed. 2. For orders, see order of even date passed in CRA-S No. 2515-SB of 2004 titled ‘Bhanu Parkash vs. State of Haryana’. (MANDEEP PANNU) 18.08.2026 JUDGE neetu Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No NEETU RANI 2026.08.19 10:28 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this ORDER/JUDGMENT PHHC, CHD