IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 436 CWP-4536-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Balwan Singh …..Petitioner Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority .....Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Arvind Seth, Advocate for the respondent. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY , J . (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the respondent states that due to interim order passed by this court, the petitioner continued in service till his retirement and as such the present petition has been rendered infructuous, which his counsel is unable to rebut. 2. Disposed of accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Satyawan Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SATYAWAN 2026.07.10 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document