Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
-1- 281 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2403-2005 (O&M) Date of Decision:07.07.2026 SEEMA DEVI AND ORS. ...Appellants Versus BALWANT SINGH AND ORS. ...Respondents CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARMOD GOYAL Present: None.
PARMOD GOYAL, J. (ORAL) Present IOIN has been placed by Registry before this Court stating that service of respondent No.1 could not be completed for want of correct address which is not being filed by appellant despite repeated letters issued to learned counsel for the appellants. Even notices issued to learned counsel for the appellants received back with the report that he has died and notice to appellants received back with the report that they are not residing at given address.
2. In view of above, IOIN stands disposed of.
3. Main case is taken on board today itself. Main case
4. In view of above explained position, it seems that appellants are no more interested in prosecuting present appeal.
5. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in default for non- prosecution, with liberty to seek revival on showing just cause.
RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.08 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
FAO-2403-2005 (O&M) -2-
6. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of accordingly.
(PARMOD GOYAL) 07.07.2026 JUDGE Ravinder Whether Speaking/Reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No RAVINDER DHANIA 2026.07.08 10:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document