Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228
FAO-3767-2005
Date of Decision:-16.03.2026 Sadhu Singh ……Appellant Versus Harjinder Singh alias Jinda and Ors. ..…Respondents CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None for the appellant. Mr.Gopal Mittal, Advocate, for the respondent No.3/Insurance Company. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
, J. (Oral)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant for the last three consecutive dates. Today also, no one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant in the present appeal.
2. In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeal pertains to the year 2005, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the same, if so advised, as per law.
3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 16.03.2026 anil Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No