271 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-5682-2005 Date of Decision: March 23, 2026 Ram Kumar … Appellant Versus Pawan Kumar and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellant. Mr. R.C. Gupta, Advocate for respondent No.3-Insurance Company. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) Noce to the appellant, sent in pursuant to the previous order is received with the report that the appellant is not residing at the given address. The address as menoned in the memo of pares is the same as menoned in the Award passed by the Tribunal. No other address of the appellant is available. In the aforesaid circumstances, present appeal is hereby disposed of with liberty to the appellant to get it revived, in case any cause of acon sll survives. March 23, 2026 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No SARITA RANI 2026.03.23 15:21 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order