Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1370 (PNJ)

SMT. SHEELA DEVI v. BALBIR SINGH

RSA/2419/2005 · 2026-01-16

Amarinder Singh Grewal

body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

RSA-2419-2005 IN TH 118  Sheela Devi Balbir Singh CORAM : HON Present: Mr. Ms. for t  Mr. for t *** AMARINDER S C.M. No.15130 1. The with Section 151 disposing off th arrived between t 2. The concurrent findin specific perform dismissed. 3. Duri entered between been received 21.11.2025 of In 2005 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR RSA Dat Versus  HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAR Mr. Shailendra Jain, Senior Advocat Ms. Ruchi Jain, Advocate  for the appellant. Mr. Ajit Singh, Advocate for the respondent. ***  DER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 5130-C of 2025 and RSA No.2419 of The instant application has been fil on 151 CPC on behalf of the appellan off the instant regular second appea ween the parties. The plaintiff is the appellant befo finding rendered by the learned Cou erformance of the agreement to se During the pendency of the instant tween both the parties in terms of w ived by the appellant-plaintiff vi of Indian Bank, Branch Gharaunda UNJAB AND HARYANA  IGARH RSA No.2419 of 2005 (O&M) Date of Decision:16.01.2026 ... Appellant ...Respondent MARINDER SINGH GREWAL dvocate with RAL) 419 of 2005 (O&M) een filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read ppellant as well as the respondent for appeal on the basis of compromise t before this Court challenging the d Courts below whereby her suit for to sell dated 15.05.1998 has been nstant appeal, a compromise has been s of which a sum of Rs.50,000/- has iff vide cheque No.764054 dated nda from the respondent-defendant dent 3 read ent for romise ng the uit for been s been has dated endant PANKAJ KUMAR 2026.01.23 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh RSA-2419-2005 and consequently the basis of ag respondent-defen all encumbrances the parties and t conditions of th therefore, pray t as arrived at betw 4. In v application (C.M appeal is dispos parties. Decree s 5. Misc January 16, 202 Pankaj* 2005 (O&M) -2- uently, she would not have any enfor of agreement to sell dated 15.05. defendant shall be the absolute owne rances including the said agreement and their successors/assignees under of the aforesaid compromise for pray that the instant appeal be disposed between the parties. In view of the aforesaid facts C.M. No.15130-C of 2025) is allowe disposed of, in terms of the compro ecree sheet be prepared accordingly. Miscellaneous application(s), if any, (AMARIN , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable enforceable right, title or interest on 15.05.1998. Meaning thereby, the e owner of the suit property free from ment to sell dated 15.05.1998. Both undertake to abide by the terms and e for all intents and purposes and isposed of in terms of the compromise facts and circumstances, the misc. allowed and the instant regular second ompromise entered into between the if any, also stand disposed of. ARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE ned : Yes/No : Yes/No rest on y, the e from Both s and and romise misc. second en the PANKAJ KUMAR 2026.01.23 10:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh