Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1362 (PNJ)

SHALINI9 BINDLISH AND ORS v. NARINDER SINGH AND ORS

COCP/6121/2025 · 2026-01-14

Nidhi Gupta

body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 106 Shalini Bin Narinder CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU claimants a P-1) passed 2005 titled others” and others vs. appeals we to the petiti further dire three month amount has query, lear COCP-6121-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No.6121 o Date of decision ini Bindlish and others Versus nder Singh and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advoc for the petitioners. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present contempt petitio ants alleging violation of the order da passed by co-ordinate Bench of this titled as “National Insurance compan rs” and FAO No.2784 of 2004 titled rs vs. Narinder Singh and others”, w als were disposed of while enhancing e petitioners to Rs.15,49,000/-. Vide order dated 08.11.202 er directed that the said amount be pa months alongwith interest @7.5% per Learned counsel for the petit nt has not been received by the petiti y, learned counsel for the petitioners 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 6121 of 2025 (O & M) cision :-14.01.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate petition has been filed by the rder dated 08.11.2024 (Annexure of this court in FAO No.493 of ompany vs. Shalini Bindlish and titled as “Shalini Bindlish and ers”, whereby the aforesaid first ancing the compensation payable 1.2024 (Annexure P-1) it was t be paid to the petitioners within 5% per annum. e petitioner submits that the said petitioners till date. On a Court oners has acknowledged that the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document respondent amount bef were not in petition is recourse to January 1 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo COCP-6121-2025 (O & M) ndent No.3-Insurance Company has d nt before the learned Executing Cou not informed about the same. In view of the aforesaid fa ion is dismissed being not maintainabl Learned counsel for the peti rse to the appropriate remedy availabl Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, ary 14, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 y has deposited the compensation g Court, however, the petitioners aid fact, the present contempt tainable. e petitioner is at liberty to take vailable to him, as per law. if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.01.15 18.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document