Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2005 DAILYLAW 1239 (DEL)

DR.ANAND MAKKAR v. INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

W.P.(C)/5105/2005 · 2026-02-07

Neena Bansal Krishna

Writ Petition (Civil)body2005

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5105/2005, CM APPL. 3734/2005, CM APPL. 51902/2019 (for early hearing) DR.ANAND MAKKAR .....Petitioner Through: None versus INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY .....Respondent Through: Mr. T. Singhdev, Advocate with Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocate for Respondent 1 (IIT Delhi) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 07.02.2026 1. None has appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, though, the counsel had appeared on the last date. 2. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the issue has been agitated till the Apex Court with no success by the Petitioner. 3. Considering none is present, the Write Petition along with the Applications, is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J FEBRUARY 7, 2026/RS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:02:57