1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. 245 of 2004 Date of Decision: 29.7.2026 Devi Singh & ors. ...Appellants Versus Ramki Devi (deceased) through LRs & ors. ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 No. For the Appellants : Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Tamanna Sharma, Advocate. For Respondents No.1(a) to 1(c) : Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Ms. Richa Sharma, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has appeared in the Court and stated that she has no objection for passing the decree in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 Separate statements of the parties were recorded on 30.3.2026, wherein they stated that they have no objection in case the present appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise effected between them. Hence the present appeal is disposed of in terms of CMP No. 5954 of 2026, which shall form part of the decree. In view of the above, the present appeal stands disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Records of the learned Courts below be sent down forthwith. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 29th July, 2026 (Chander)