Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 1041/2004 IA No. 1137/2004 c/w OWP No. 826/2004 CM No. 534/2004 IA No. 891/2004
Joginder Singh
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
Haqiqat Singh and ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sanpreet Singh, Advocate Ms. Sagira Jaffar, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 24.04.2026
1. No one has cause appearance on behalf of the petitioners in the instant cases ever since 27th March, 2024. In fact in OWP No. 1041/2004, taking note of the fact that learned counsel representing the petitioner had expired, this Court had issued notice to the petitioner for making arrangement for his representation in the said petition.
2. A report of the Registry reveals that notice was sent on 24.02.2026 but none has caused appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
3. In view of the above, this Court is choice-less but to dismiss both these petitions for non prosecution along with connected applications.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 24.04.2026 Neha-II
Serial No. 3 NEHA KUMARI 2026.04.24 17:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document