Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2004 DAILYLAW 1584 (AP)

P.Ranga Rao v. K. Purushotham Chowdary

AS/4106/2004 · 2026-04-06

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2004

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010430952004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 4106/2004 Between: 1. P.RANGA RAO, S/O. LATE SEETHAPATHI RAO DOCTOR R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 2. PEYYETI SAVITRI DEVI, W/O. RANGA RAO R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 3. P.ANIL KUMAR, S/O. RANGA RAO R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 4. P. PADMAJA, D/O. RANGA RAO R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 5. P.VENKATA SEETHAPATHI RAO, S/O. RANGA RAO R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 6. SATYAVOLU ROJALAKSHMI, W/O. SREENU R/O. RANGAPURAM HAMLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. K PURUSHOTHAM CHOWDARY, S/O. VENKATESHWARA RAO CULTIVATION R/O. MANDAVALLI KAIKALUR KRISHNA DT. 2. K CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. VENKATESHWARA RAO CULTIVATION R/O. K.C.P. COLONY VIJAYAWADA 3. M KANAKA RAO, S/O. ADINARAYANA R/O. RANGAPURAM, HAMPLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 4. A JAYAD PRASAD RAO, S/O. SAMUDRUDU HOSPITADL WARDEN R/O. RANGAPURAM, HAMPLET OF PEYYERU MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 5. B VENKATESHWARA RAO, S/O. KOTAIAH R/O. RANGAPURAM, HAMPLET OF PEYYERU, MUDINEPALLI (M) KRISHNA DT. 6. LIC OF INDIA REP BY ITS SENIOR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE , MACHILIPATNAM. R-6 IS IMPLEADED AS PER C.O.DT:31-10-08 IN ASMP-1712/08. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal against the Judgement and decree passed in OS No. 8 of 1998 on the file of the cosurt of the I Additional District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, dated 12-12-2003 IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 15024 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceeedings pursuant to the decree & judgment in OS No.8/98 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. Dist. Dist. Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam, dt.12-12-03 pending disposal of main appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2008(ASMP 1712 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased implead the proposed party respondent No.10 herein as Respondent No.6 in the First Appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2008(ASMP 1729 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in E.P. No. 22/2006 in O.S. No. 17/2000 on the file of the Principal District Judge's Court, Krishna at Machlipatnam. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Sub Registrar, Mudinepalli, Krishna District, not to register any document in respect of the suit schedule property i.e., land admeasuring an extent of Ac.4.56cents including building in Sy.No.204/2 of Peyyeru Village, Mudienpalli Mandal, Krishna District, pending final disposal of the main appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. A VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. M V S SURESH KUMAR 2. K J V N PUNDAREEKAKSHUDU 3. R V SUBBA RAO 4. SURESH KUMAR ROUTHU SC FOR LIC OF INDIA The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 4106/2004 JUDGMENT:- Though the matter has been listed under the caption “for dismissal”, none appeared for the appellant(s). It appears that the appellant(s) are not inclined to prosecute the matter. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending and the Interim Order granted earlier, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 07.04.2026 LSP 59 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 4106/2004 07.04.2026 LSP