Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2004 DAILYLAW 1578 (AP)

BALAGAM JHANSI & 2 OTHER v. KOLLU SUBBA RAO

TRAS/2372/2004 · 2026-04-07

Venuthurumalli Gopala Krishna Rao

body2004

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010114062004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER APPEAL NO: 2372/2004 Between: 1. BALAGAM JHANSI & 2 OTHER, - ...APPELLANT AND 1. KOLLU SUBBA RAO, - ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2006(ASMP 85 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 600 days in filing the above LR application and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 2 OF 2006(TRASMP 131 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 3 OF 2006(TRASMP 132 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 4 OF 2006(TRASMP 133 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit 4th petitioner on record as the proposed legal representative of the 3rd Applellant Balagam Jayalakshmi and implead in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 847 days in filing the application to bring the Legal Representative of the deceased 3rd appellant in the above appeal in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To set aside the abatement of appeal pursuant to the death of the 3rd appellant Viz Balagam vijayalakshmi in the interest of the Justice and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 4 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit me to bring proposed Respondents 8 and 9 as the legal representatives of the 7th Respondent namely Singothu Sudha and implead them me as Respondents 8 and 9 in the above appeal in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. S RAMA CHANDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent: 1. . The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRASFER APPEAL SUIT No.2372 of 2004 JUDGMENT: When the matter was listed on 07.04.2026, none appeared for the appellants. 2. Though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”, today, none appeared for the appellants. 3. It appears that the appellants have no interest in prosecuting the Appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Transfer Appeal Suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 08.04.2026 JLSR 10 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO TRANSFER APPEAL SUIT No.2372 of 2004 Date: 08.04.2026 JLSR