CWP-19958-2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 161 CWP-19958-2004 (O&M) Date of decision:- 02.09.2026 Amir Chand Punia ...Petitioner vs. Corporation Bank and ors. ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present:- None for the petitioner. Mr.Saurabh Bhardwaj, Advocate and Ms. Poonam Thakur, Advocate for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. On 17.07.2026, since no one had put in appearance on behalf of the parties, Registry was directed to issue notice to the parties as well as to their counsels. As per office report, notice issued to petitioner has been received back with the report of incomplete address of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has been informed through email. 2. Today, the case was called twice but no one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 3. In view of the above, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present petition for want of prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive this petition, in case any cause of action survives. 6. Pending application (s) if any also stands disposed of. 02.09.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Gaurav Arora JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No GAURAV ARORA 2026.09.02 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document