109-2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15436-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 02.09.2026 BALDEV SINGH AND ORS ..Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: Mr. Jugam Arora, Advocate Mr. Shivam Ahuja, Advocate Mr. Parbat K. Jalbera, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ravneet S. Joshi, DAG, Punjab. SUDEEPTI SHARMA , J. (Oral) 1. On 16.07.2026, learned counsel for the petitioners contends that he is not able to contact the petitioners and registry was directed to issue notice to the petitioners. 2. As per the report of registry, notice issued to the petitioners received back with the report as under:- “Petitioner No.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11, 12, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26:- Retired from service Petitioner No.21 and 27 :- Served Petitioner No.7, 9, 13, 15, 16, 18 :- No information about said persons found at given address as per report.” 3. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, this Court is left with no other choice but to dismiss the present writ petition for non-prosecution. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Liberty is however granted to the petitioners to file an application for revival if anything still survives. 6. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. September 02nd, 2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) Ayub/Sahil JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SAHIL 2026.09.03 18:11 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.