Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2004 DAILYLAW 1495 (BOM)

DATTA PANCHAYATAN AND ORS. v. MARUTI MALU SALUNKHE AND ORS.

LPA/40/2004 · 2026-09-03

body2004

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2-LPA-40-2004.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7323 OF 2000 Datta Panchayatan And Others ...Appellants. Versus Maruti Malu Salunkhe And Others ...Respondents. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 69 OF 2014 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 Datta Panchayatan Public Charitable Trust And Others ...Applicants. Versus Maruti Malu Salunkhe And Others ...Respondents. WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3443 OF 2022 IN LETTER PATENT APPEAL NO. 40 OF 2004 Milind Jaykumar Kole ...Applicant. In the matter between Datta Panchayatan And Others ...Appellants. Versus Maruti Malu Salunkhe And Others ...Respondents. —————— Mr. Prajakt M. Arjunwadkar a/w Ritesh R. Raut for the Appellant. Mr. Tejpal Ingale a/w Vrunali Vilankar & Aryan Sawant for Respondent Nos. 1B (i to iv). —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Harish 1 of 2 HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Digitally signed by HARISH VITHAL CHAUDHARI Date: 2026.09.04 10:23:09 +0530 2-LPA-40-2004.doc Date : September 03, 2026. P. C. : 1. After hearing learned counsel for the parties for some time, learned counsel for the Appellants, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Letters Patent Appeal. 2. The Letters Patent Appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. In view of disposal of the Letters Patent Appeal, Civil Applicant and Interim Application, if any, do not survive for consideration and stand disposed of. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Harish 2 of 2