Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN TH 105
B.L. Bhan
State of Ha
CORAM:
Present:-
NIDHI GU
in the natu
order dated petitioner h
present cas Supreme C another 20
petitioner t said judgm CWP-17483-2004 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
CWP No.17483 o
Date of decision Bhandari Versus of Haryana and others
AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI
Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A HI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Prayer in the present writ petit e nature of certiorari for quashing of r dated 21.9.2004 (Annexure P-8) vid ioner has been reduced.
Learned counsel for the par nt case is covered by the ratio of eme Court in K.S. Krishaswamy etc 2006(13) SCC 215. It is, accordingly prayed by ioner that the present writ petition be
judgment.
1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 7483 of 2004 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA cate ddl. A.G., Haryana. it petition is for issuance of a writ ing of letter (Annexure P-5) and 8) vide which the pension of the e parties are ad idem that the tio of the judgment of Hon’ble y etc. vs. Union of India and ed by learned counsel for the ion be dismissed in view of the VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
present wr Krishaswam
present wri
August 13 Vijay Asija
Whether spea Whether Repo
CWP-17483-2004 (O & M)
Learned counsel for the State h nt writ petition is dismissed in view swamy’s (supra). Accordingly, in view of the f nt writ petition stands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, 3, 2026
r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No
2 State has no objection in case the n view of the judgment in K.S. f the facts mentioned above, the if any, shall stand(s) disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document