CWP-17185-2004 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 421 CWP-17185-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Mange Ram (since deceased through LRs) and others …..Petitioners Versus Haryana Agro Industries Corporation Limited and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present:- Mr. Samrat Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG. Haryana. Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi, Advocate with Ms. Ayushi, Advocate for respondent No.1. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY , J . (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners refers to the judgment passed by this Court in CWP-356-1984 titled Raj Kishore & others vs. State of Haryana and another (Annexure P-2) filed by similarly circumstanced employees for claiming the relief as prayed for by the petitioners, which was allowed and implemented by the State. However, the claim of the petitioners though recommended by the Corporation vide Annexures P-3 to P-6 for removal of anomalies, was not approved by the department concerned without assigning any reasons. SATYAWAN 2026.07.10 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-17185-2004 2 2. Without commenting on the merits of the case the respondent- Corporation is directed to reconsider the matter by taking note of the aforesaid judgment and order passed thereupon in case of others expeditiously in accordance with law. 3. Disposed of accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 08.07.2026 Satyawan Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No SATYAWAN 2026.07.10 09:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document