IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 384 CWP-3798-2004 (O&M) Date of decision: 07.07.2026 Charan Singh ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY ***** Present : None for the petitioner Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. AG, Haryana ***** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Prayer made in the present petition, might not be surviving, due to efflux of time. 2. Learned State counsel on the other hand states that the pensionary benefits were not granted on account of petitioner having not rendered 10 years of service in the respondent-Department and the one rendered by him in the HSMITC, could not be counted as per the conditions of the appointment letter. 3. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived, in case need arises. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE 07.07.2026 M.Kamra Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No MOHIT 2026.07.07 15:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document