Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 228
RSA-100-2004 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-11.03.2026
Charanjit Kaur ……Appellant Versus Jeet Singh and Others
..……Respondents CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL **** Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Akshay Jain, Advocate, for respondents No.3 to 8. **** AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL
, J. (Oral)
1. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant on the last date. Today also, no one has also put in appearance on her behalf.
2. In view of the above, and considering the fact that the present appeal pertains to the year 2004, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the matter pending. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution, with liberty to the appellant to seek revival of the same, if so advised, as per law.
3. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
(AMARINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE 11.03.2026 anil Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No