(O&M) RAJ RANI AND OTHERS v. HARMEET SINGH AND OTHERS
FAO/3833/2004 · 2026-03-11
Deepak Gupta
body2004
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2004 DAILYLAW 1409 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2004 DAILYLAW 1409 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
224
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ****
FAO-3833-2004 Date of decision: 11.03.2026
Raj Rani and another
. . . . Appellants Vs. Harmeet Singh and others
. . . . Respondents **** CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA
**** Present: - None for the appellants.
Mr. Vikas Mahesempuri, Advocate
For respondents No.2 & 3.
**** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Nobody has put in appearance on behalf of the appellants. Same was the position on the previous date of hearing. It is despite the fact that counsel for the appellants was duly informed not only for the previous date, but also for today.
2.
It appears that appellants are no longer interested in pursuing the appeal and as such, the same is hereby dismissed in default for want of prosecution.
(DEEPAK GUPTA) 11.03.2026 JUDGE
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes Whether reportable
No
VIVEK PAHWA 2026.03.12 10:37 I agree to specified portions of this document Chandigarh