IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 108 FAO-2698-2004 Date of Decision: 22.04.2026 Mahi Pal and Others …..Appellants Vs. Gurchana Singh and Others .….Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- None for the appellants. Mr. Rik Khurana, Advocate for Mr. Deepak Jaglan, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Prince Bharal, Advocate for Mr. S.S. Kang, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Jayant Singh Chauhan, Advocate for Ms. Madhu Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.3- Insurance Company. **** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) On the previous date of hearing, Mr. Om Parkash, Advocate through whom the appeal had been filed had appeared and submi/ed that appellants are no longer in his contact and therefore, Court noce was sent to them. Today Court noces issued to both the appellants received back unserved with the report that they have le1 the village. No other address of the appellants is available. In these circumstances, the present appeal stands disposed of for want of prosecuon. (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE April 22, 2026 Neeka Tuteja Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No NEETIKA TUTEJA 2026.04.22 14:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document