Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2003 DAILYLAW 3002 (ALL)

TULSI RAM v. D.D.C. RAMPUR AND OTHERS

WRIB/5943/2003 · 2026-05-04

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2003

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 5943 of 2003 Court No. - 54 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. Re: Civil Misc. Delay Condonation / Substitution Application Nos.7 & 8, both of 2025. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant applications have been filed to substitute the legal heirs of deceased sole petitioner along with an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. 3. Vakalatnama of the proposed heirs has been annexed along with the applications. 4. The reason for condonation of delay mentioned in the affidavit is satisfactory. Delay in filing the substitution application is condoned. 5. Let the word 'deceased' be mentioned against the name of sole petitioner and the names of his legal heirs as mentioned in the prayer clause of the application be substituted as petitioner nos. 1/1 and 1/3. 6. The applications are, accordingly, allowed. Re: Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application No.9/2026. 1. Heard Sri Shreeprakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dinesh Pathak, learned counsel for the private respondents. 2. The instant withdrawal application, supported by the affidavit of the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shreeprakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dinesh Pathak, N.K.Rastogi Tulsi Ram .....Petitioner(s) D.D.C. Rampur And Others .....Respondent(s) petitioners, has been filed to dismiss the instant writ petition as withdrawn. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that in view of the facts mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the instant writ petition be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of the facts mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of the application as well as in the light of the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner, the application is allowed. 5. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Order on Writ Petition 1. In view of the order passed on the aforementioned Civil Misc. Withdrawal Application, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 2. Interim order granted by this court is vacated. May 5, 2026 C.Prakash WRIB No. 5943 of 2003 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad