Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2003 DAILYLAW 1904 (PNJ)

(O&M)JAGDISH AND OTHERS v. MOHINDRA AND MOHINDRA FINANCE LTD AND OTHERS

FAO/1031/2003 · 2026-08-03

Parmod Goyal

body2003

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.1031 of 2003 (O&M) Date of decision:30.01.2014 Jagdish and others ... Appellants versus Mohindra and Mohindra Finance Services Limited and another. .... Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN ---- Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Raj Kumar Bashamboo, Advocate, for Mr. D.P. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.2. ---- K.Kannan, J. (Oral) 1. The original papers have been burnt in a fire accident that took place on 31.01.2011. A Committee was constituted and papers have been reconstructed with the assistance of the counsel who supplied the copies. Wherever information was available regarding the status of service and counsel were appearing, the cause list gave those details and cases were taken up for hearing. In respect of cases where there was no counsel on record and papers could not be reconstructed, notice had been sent to parties as found in the court registers. In respect of some cases, persons have responded and in many cases nobody has responded. 2. In the above case, the papers have been reconstructed and the cause list gives names of counsel of both sides. There is no representation for the appellants when the matter is called. The appeal is dismissed for default of appearance and non prosecution. (K.KANNAN) JUDGE 30.01.2014 sanjeev Kumar Sanjeev 2014.02.07 11:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh