IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 116-2 STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND Vs Vs Vs Vs SMT. JAILO SMT. JAILO SMT. JAILO SMT. JAILO DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. for the appellants. Mr. Ms. Pallavi Singh, Advocate and Mr. Kabir Singh Bedi, Advocate for the HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) For detailed order, see order of even date passed in 2003 2003 2003 2003 titled ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Pending July July July July 23 23 23 23, 202 , 202 , 202 , 2026666 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH FAO FAO FAO FAO No. No. No. No.1280 1280 1280 1280 Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. ORS. ORS. ORS. DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. DEVI AND ORS. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. for the appellants. Mr. Jasmeet Singh Bedi, Advocate Ms. Pallavi Singh, Advocate and Mr. Kabir Singh Bedi, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) For detailed order, see order of even date passed in ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ Compensation Act, 1923 and others.’ ending misc. application(s), if any, shall Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH 1280 1280 1280 1280 of of of of 2003 2003 2003 2003 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: 23.07 23.07 23.07 23.07.202 .202 .202 .2026666 ...... ...... ...... ......Appellants Appellants Appellants Appellants ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent ....Respondent((((ssss)))) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJAAAA Mr. R.P.S. Brar, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. with For detailed order, see order of even date passed in FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s , if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE 1 FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of FAO No.314 of ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s ‘Smt. Jailo Devi and others Vs. Commissioner under Workmen’s MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.29 11:20 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment