IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 206 Hawa Singh State of Haryana and CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefits of ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’ under Article 39(d) relying upon judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh similar situated employees and one of the similar situated employee, namely, Krishan Kumar s/o Sh. Bhale Singh is getting the same benefits of ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’. submits that the services of the petitioner have already been regularized as per Policy dated 01.10.2003 with all consequential CWP-15830-2023 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.15830 of 2023 Date of decision : Hawa Singh Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate with Ms. Anita S. Choudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG, Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in the present civil writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefits of ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’ under Article 39(d) relying upon judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in Punjab vs. Jagjit Singh 2017 SCC 148 (Annexure P similar situated employees and one of the similar situated employee, namely, Krishan Kumar s/o Sh. Bhale Singh is getting the same benefits of ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the services of the petitioner have already been regularized as per Policy dated 01.10.2003 with all consequential 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 15830 of 2023 (O & M) Date of decision :-17.07.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Nihal S. Choudhary, Advocate with Ms. Anita S. Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG, Haryana. Prayer in the present civil writ petition is for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant the benefits of ‘Equal Pay for Equal Work’ under Article 39(d) relying upon judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of 2017 SCC 148 (Annexure P-6) whereas, the similar situated employees and one of the similar situated employee, namely, Krishan Kumar s/o Sh. Bhale Singh is getting the same At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the services of the petitioner have already been regularized as per Policy dated 01.10.2003 with all consequential VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.17 16.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document benefits, and therefore, learned counsel prays that the present writ petition may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. July 17, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No CWP-15830-2023 (O & M) benefits, and therefore, learned counsel prays that the present writ tion may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Reportable Yes / No 2 benefits, and therefore, learned counsel prays that the present writ tion may be disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.07.17 16.29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document